DAVID RUBINSTEIN

   Nursing Homes Affiliated with DAVID RUBINSTEIN

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that DAVID RUBINSTEIN is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.

NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Avant Rehabilitation and Care Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 149 TRENTON, NJ Ranking: #184 out of 185 (Ranking List)
Bedrock Rehabilitation and Nursing Center at Lake Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 90 EUSTIS, FL Ranking: #20 out of 73 (Ranking List)
Bedrock Rehabilitation and Nursing Center at Lake Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 113 LAKE CITY, FL Ranking: #4 out of 7 (Ranking List)
Bedrock Rehabilitation and Nursing Center at Melbo Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 138 MELBOURNE, FL Ranking: #4 out of 18 (Ranking List)
Bedrock Rehabilitation and Nursing Center at Suwan Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 180 LIVE OAK, FL Ranking: #7 out of 9 (Ranking List)
Bedrock Rehabilitation and Nursing Center at Winte Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 180 MAITLAND, FL Ranking: #60 out of 68 (Ranking List)
Belle Care Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 106 TRENTON, NJ Ranking: #156 out of 184 (Ranking List)
Boca Circle Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 BOCA RATON, FL Ranking: #58 out of 68 (Ranking List)
Bowling Green Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 66 BOWLING GREEN, KY Ranking: #2 out of 13 (Ranking List)
Brandenburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 57 BRANDENBURG, KY Ranking: #6 out of 40 (Ranking List)
Campbellsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 67 CAMPBELLSVILLE, KY Ranking: #2 out of 11 (Ranking List)
Christian Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 60 PEMBROKE, KY Ranking: #8 out of 11 (Ranking List)
Cumberland Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 93 SOMERSET, KY Ranking: #7 out of 9 (Ranking List)
Cypress Garden Center For Nursing and Rehab Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 278 FLUSHING, NY Ranking: #93 out of 361 (Ranking List)
Elizabethtown Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 65 ELIZABETHTOWN, KY Ranking: #4 out of 15 (Ranking List)
Fordsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 67 FORDSVILLE, KY Ranking: #12 out of 18 (Ranking List)
Franklin-Simpson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 98 FRANKLIN, KY Ranking: #20 out of 20 (Ranking List)
Hardinsburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 63 HARDINSBURG, KY Ranking: #10 out of 10 (Ranking List)
Henderson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 90 HENDERSON, KY Ranking: #10 out of 35 (Ranking List)
Irvine Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 86 IRVINE, KY Ranking: #5 out of 15 (Ranking List)
Kenwood Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 93 RICHMOND, KY Ranking: #1 out of 27 (Ranking List)
Madison Health and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 92 RICHMOND, KY Ranking: #24 out of 27 (Ranking List)
Morganfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 60 MORGANFIELD, KY Ranking: #9 out of 29 (Ranking List)
River Haven Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 103 PADUCAH, KY Ranking: #16 out of 16 (Ranking List)
Salyersville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 142 SALYERSVILLE, KY Ranking: #8 out of 8 (Ranking List)
Seagate Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Role: partnership interest	No. of Beds: 360 BROOKLYN, NY Ranking: #55 out of 351 (Ranking List)
Shady Lawn Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 50 CADIZ, KY Ranking: #4 out of 11 (Ranking List)
Springfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 70 SPRINGFIELD, KY Ranking: #6 out of 15 (Ranking List)
Springfield Skilled Care Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 SPRINGFIELD, MO Ranking: #27 out of 29 (Ranking List)
Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 81 STANTON, KY Ranking: #5 out of 12 (Ranking List)
Twin Rivers Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 132 OWENSBORO, KY Ranking: #28 out of 38 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

   Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with DAVID RUBINSTEIN

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that DAVID RUBINSTEIN was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Woodcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 11/01/2022 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 127 ELSMERE, KY Ranking: #6 out of 113 (Ranking List)
Little Neck Care Center Most Recent Record: 03/01/2018 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 LITTLE NECK, NY Ranking: #173 out of 316 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

  About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database

Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.

The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:

• 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
• DIRECTOR
• MANAGING EMPLOYEE
• OFFICER
• OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
• PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.